Information

Mission

Deliver rapid, rigorous, and impact-ready evidence so leaders can make clear, defensible decisions—on time and in context.

Vision

A world where important decisions routinely turn high-quality evidence into better policy, faster.

Evidence Synthesis

Evidence synthesis is the foundation of PRESS Consulting’s work. It involves systematically gathering, evaluating, and integrating findings from diverse sources of research and practice to provide a clear, balanced understanding of what is known—and what remains uncertain—on a given topic.

Unlike single studies that provide narrow insights, evidence synthesis brings together multiple studies, policies, and perspectives to generate a more reliable and comprehensive picture. This process allows decision-makers to move beyond individual reports or anecdotal evidence and instead rely on carefully appraised, aggregated knowledge.

At PRESS, we tailor evidence syntheses to meet the needs of policymakers, health system leaders, non-profits, and private organizations. Whether through a systematic review (deep and rigorous), a rapid review (fast yet focused), or a scoping review (broad mapping of existing knowledge), we ensure the process is transparent, methodologically sound, and aligned with international standards.

The result is not just an academic report, but a decision-ready product: clear summaries, actionable recommendations, and insights that highlight practical implications, policy relevance, and evidence gaps. By transforming complex research into accessible knowledge, evidence synthesis empowers clients to make timely, informed, and strategic choices.

Systematic Review

Comprehensive, rigorous evidence syntheses that follow established protocols to answer focused research questions with the highest level of reliability. Ideal for decisions requiring depth and precision.

Rapid Scoping Review

Rapid Reviews

Streamlined evidence syntheses that balance speed and rigor to provide timely, decision-ready insights. Perfect for informing urgent policy or program decisions.

Scoping Reviews

Broad reviews that map existing evidence, identify gaps, and clarify key concepts in emerging or complex fields. Useful for shaping research agendas and strategy.

Qualitative Research

In-depth exploration of experiences, perspectives, and contexts through interviews, focus groups, and thematic analysis. Provides rich insights into how policies, programs, and innovations are understood, adopted, and sustained in real-world settings.